All I See Is You (Blu-ray)

What a waste of time this movie was! I'm a fan of Blake Lively, but this is by far the worst movie she's ever been in. The story is weak and you will get bored easily watching this movie hoping it's almost over. You also keep waiting for a twist ending, but it never happens. The ending isn't what I expected, but it's still just not a good ending. I don't want to say anymore in case you actually want to watch this movie, but I highly recommend you find something else and don't waste your time and money on this one.

Love Blake Lively, but this is one horrible movie.

The film is interesting and beautiful,

Good

I got the dvd sooner than expected & it’s like brand new! I love Blake Lively & this thriller was subtle but intriguing. I highly recommend!

Great movie !!!!

Poor quality DVD. Should return or replace . Very disappointed

Producer, director, writer Marc Forster, best known for directing the films Monster's Ball, Finding Neverland, The Kite Runner, Quantum of Solace and World War Z, wrote this screenplay with Sean Conway (TV series Ray Donavan and Shameless). ALL I SEE IS YOU is a theme with challenge to any writer: these two men almost meet that challenge but seem to get lost in the process. The result is a very long, tedious, cinematographer’s holiday (Matthias Koenigswieser) about the world we see and the world we don’t see. Despite the presence of some fine actors the film is tedious and loses the audience after about thirty minutes of blurry (but colorful!) versions of the world passing by the eyes of a blind girl.Apparently blinded since childhood when a hideous car-crash cost her her parents and her eyesight (a fact that is never explained – we must guess that is the case), beautiful Gina (Blake Lively) scarcely leaves their home in Bangkok, Thailand and is dependent on her attentive and doting husband, James (Jason Clark), who is her everything: her protector, her guide, and the sole intermediary with the outside world and who has never known the sighted Gina, and wants to make a baby. Medicine intervenes, a cutting-edge but highly experimental cornea transplant By one Dr. Hughes (Danny Huston) promises to restore Gina's vision, at least to her right eye--and when the bandages come off all of a sudden unexplored colors and senses begin to appear to her. But she is dependent on steroid drops in her eyes to assure the transplant takes. As a result, Gina will see her husband and her unknown reflection in the mirror for the first time, she befriends an unwanted dog, makes friends with dog walker cum sensual interest (Wes Chatham), and with time and some distance from James and an odd visit to her Barcelona sister Carla (Ahna O’Reilly) and her artsy husband Ramon (Miquel Fernández) Gina becomes pregnant (though James has discovered he is sterile!), and her vision is altered again – the reason is only suggested. And then the film ends.Chunks of the story are missing (?intentionally?) and the constant cinematic version of the world through near blind eyes becomes as tiring to the audience as it must to the patient with altered eyesight. There are some odd sidebars of Gina playing the guitar with a young girl, surreal shots of Bangkok, strange S&M scenes unexplained that keep our attention at times. The concept regarding blindness and how it affects the victim are sound. It is the delivery of the ‘story’ that begs editing. Grady Harp, August 18

The plot and premise sounded really respectable and at the very least, I hoped it would be worth a look. It was, after seeing it, some decent visuals and a strong narrative and interesting to sustain to the end, but I think that it could have been so much better. The one thing with US movies, at least for me, which is so frustrating, is their attitudes to on screen sexuality and love scenes. If only they were more liberal, but alas they're far too conservative and controlled; with scenes like that, it's don't show this, don't show that, that's okay, but be careful here and do it that way, this angle here. The scenes between (no spoiler intended), the woman, who's sight is restored and another guy, whom she has a fling and love scene with could have been sexy as hell and wonderfully passionate, if she had done the scene, naturally, yes, nude, but she didn't. It is a very quick scene, with a lot of fast cuts and visual effects to get her somewhat strange perspective, and I think the film suffers as a result. You really could feel for her and the husband, but occasionally, it's confusing and it just doesn't have the pace I think it should.I won't say that I was disappointed with it, I am keeping it, since it definitely has its moments, no doubt of that, but I still believe that, bar the age old US weakness of on screen sexuality, which would have been perfectly justified with the plot, it could have been a sexy, driving, passionate, but in many ways, sad, cracker.I think the movie will grow on me and I will appreciate it for what it is as is, a decent psychological relationship drama.

Wow! Don't bother. As predictable as can be. Crap acting with an even more crap story. 😬

good dvd

Strange movie, not quite sure if it makes me feel good but its food for thought and maybe thats good.

The story itself is promising with good actors, however the flow of the movie is slow and muddled, I thought I was watching a old foreign film looking for the feeling of the film.....it wasn’t there.3 stars are for the actors.