Cherokee Men's Work Utility Shorts

Comodos, ligeros, quedan justo como lo describe

these seem to be okay. We'll see how long they last. Might buy more. However it says "loose fit" and that couldn't be further from the truth. I wear a 30" but got a 32" just in case, and it fits very snug. The only part loose is the crotch area. I suppose that's a good thing, if it prevents them from ripping. If they can survive a kitchen for more than a few months I may increase the # of stars on this review. Just be warned you most definitely need a size up to fit the waist properly. 2 sizes if you're looking for a loose waist fit. ***Update*** they hold up great however I ordered a couple more pairs, same size, and they are a little too big. Seems to be a lack of quality control or somebody has been stiching the wrong size label on them. Still decent but ugh. Oh and the belt loops are too small, I struggle to get my belt through them.

Dickies Men's 13" Loose Fit Twill Cargo Shorts are woulderful, fit , lightweight. Value is worthly. I purchased 4 pairs as a present for my boyfriend for work. Automatic work you get grease , oil and many more difficult things to get out of clothing but they still look new and not one stain on them.

Fit good lots of room

EDIT: It's been a few years since I ordered the 32s and I have been slacking on bike riding since. I have gone up to size 36. I am planning to ride a lot this summer again so I decided to order one of these in 36 and also grabbed some new wrangler shorts in 36. These in size 36 measure 36.5 while the 36 wranglers measure 38.5. 2 full inch difference is way bigger than I had with the only 1 inch difference in 32s with the Wranglers being worn out. I don't know if this inconsistent difference is on Dickies end or Wrangles end (or both) but I definitely think a size up is needed at 2 inch difference. It could however just be that wranglers run large and these are proper size, hence why I am telling the measurements. It makes sense to me that 36's should be about 36 inches, but I question a lot of the measurement systems we use sometimes. Original: I measured my old worn out 32 Wrangler shorts and they have a circumference of 34 inches. Size 32 of these measures about 33 inches. They are admittedly smaller but these are new and my other shorts are worn out so I think they are likely fairly close to the same size when both new. As for the length shown in the picture, that depends how tall you are and how high up you wear them. I got these for wearing on bike rides since I cant have bagginess in the crotch area when pedaling and regular shorts ride up to show over half of my thighs when worn up that high. These shorts stop right at my knees when worn this high.