Wrangler Riggs Workwear mens Ranger work utility pants, Navy, 46W x 32L US

My pockets normally carry a minimum of two phones, reading glasses, wallet, Bluetooth ear buds, pocket knife, tape measure, a set of work keys, a set of home keys, and two pens. Instead of wearing a man purse to carry all this stuff around, I prefer cargo pants, and these pants have been great. Casual cargo pants tend to sag strangely under the load of all my stuff. These don't. The other big name workwear type cargo pants I've tried got holes and frayed edges because the fabric was too stiff. These haven't. There are other cargo pants out there that look more stylish, but big whup...as an old guy, I can get away with wearing a bowtie and socks with sandaIs. Other pluses? The pocket flaps lie flat, the fabric holds its color okay'ish, the thighs are cut loose so they don't stick in warm weather, the triple-stitched seams hold up nicely, and I now get fewer thorn pokes when I'm doing yardwork. I have a couple of gripes, though: 1) the slots that I keep my pens in would work better if they were just a little bit, maybe 1/2 to 1", longer, and 2) my 33" waist pairs only have 5 belt loops, but my 34" pair has 7 belt loops. Overall, while these are good enough to buy again and again, I have my eye open for something that suits me better.

As a loyal Wrangler denim jeans guy, I picked up 3 pairs of Wrangler Riggs Workwear Men's Ranger Pants at a good price to compare and supplement my go to Carhartts. The Riggs appear to be well made (Nicaragua) with good material, an abundance of pockets and heavy stitching. My complaint lies with too much distance between belt loops resulting in the pants not adequately capturing the belt. For instance, quickly hanging a drill on your belt to free up a hand results in the tool sliding and or belt sagging. There are loops on either side of the front button, one at the 3 o'clock position, one at the 6, and one at the 9, total 5 loops. My Wrangler jeans and Carhartts all have (7) seven. Don't understand why Wrangler chose 5 for the Riggs 'Workwear' line. If I'm noticing it with a 33" waist the problem is only going to be exasperated for the larger wearers. I know it sounds petty but its a deal breaker for me. Add two loops problem solved. Thank You!

I was in the market for a good, strong, hiking and trail pant. Most of the options I came across were too heavy, not durable enough, or didn't have the right pockets. I research, but rarely purchase, clothing online, but these weren't on any shelves in my area so I took the risk and ordered a pair through Amazon, thanks to a "no-fee" return offer on them at the time. Though that guarantee turned out to be a bit of a hassle I was very pleased with the purchase and ended up with three pairs, one of each color.Here is my overall analysis:Pros:1) The pants are lighter and more breathable than I expected.I have other double-knee pants; they are quite heavy. However, these are made of a durable but lightweight cotton weave that breathes very well. Considering all of the extra pockets and associated material (including Cordura-lined back pockets) I was shocked at how light the pants were.They represent the pants as being rip resistant ("Ripstop" as they say) and while I haven't seen them handle a rip, I am inclined to believe their claim. The particular weave of the cotton suggests that they would be hard to tear.2) Good pockets and belt loops.The pockets are strong, well-stitched, and located in the right places. The front hip pockets are deep and made of very strong cotton. Not the thin white cotton found in jeans, these are almost canvas-like; very reliable. As I said above, the rear pockets have thick Cordura on the inside as the lining. I am confident that my shop pencil or combination square will not easily rip through as it has with my work jeans.The cargo pockets only have fullness on the rear seam, which is smart (the front seam lies flat, which prevents brush from catching easily while on the trail). They area large enough and close with durable snaps that can be opened one-handed, but don't pop open on their own. No buttons to fumble with or weak velcro patches. There is also a cell phone pocket (maybe a little small for some), an exterior "pliers" cargo pocket, and a hammer loop; all on the right side, so Southpaws beware.The "patented tape measure patch" is kind of a gimmick as it isn't very thick leather and doesn't actually run on the inside of the pocket at all, which is where my tape always grabs and pulls. It covers the outside and the fold at the top of the pocket, but that's it. It's not bad, just doesn't really solve the tape pinching "dilemma."The seven decent belt loops (including an extra wide center loop in the back) are well-spaced and provide good support and allow ample space for useful additions like binoculars, a flashlight, or a knife (yes, even a belt holster for those who are so inclined).3) Serious stitchingAll of the major seams are triple stitched. All of the secondary ones are double and pretty serious. Most of the single-stitched are not high tension seams (just fullness and folds it seems) and look sturdy. Also the thread is of good quality. See "Cons" below for a side note.4) Relatively Reasonable PriceI paid [...] per pair (w/ free shipping and return shipping) on Amazon. Wrangler would sell direct at a little cheaper ($37 each I think) with free shipping on orders over $100. But of course, the return shipping would've been on me. So I went with Amazon. That's cheaper than Carhartts and these pants are lighter, have better pockets, and are better for hiking.However, I recently found these on a shelf at our local hardware mega-center (Menard's, for those who know it) at around $30 per pair. That's a screaming deal. So look for them. You might be able to find a local retailer by going to [...].Cons:1) Be aware - Waist measurements seem to be on the low side.I was thankful for the free return shipping deal, since the pants seem to run on the small side for their waist measurements. All of my other pants are 33s, but for these I needed a 34 to feel comfortable. And no, it wasn't merely wishful thinking on my part, the pants really do run tight in the waist.2) Made in MexicoIf you're a "Made in the USA" person, these won't fulfill that criteria. But judging by the quality, Wrangler made it clear they wanted good workmanship. If you're simply sick of substandard products from overseas, especially China, these aren't that. Not even close.3) A couple of single-stitch runs might not hold up.Here and there, I have found a few stitching errors. Thread tails, needle burps, even one unfinished end. But all of them were in non-critical places. All in all, on three pairs I found 5 or 6 errors TOTAL. I don't know if you can do better than that for assembly-line clothing.4) The free return shipping required a call to Amazon...twice.Despite the "automatic" nature of the free return shipping offer from Amazon, both of the pairs that I returned resulted in a return shipping charge on the return amount. This required a call to an Amazon Support rep both times to have return shipping refunded to me as well. The reps were friendly, quick to reverse it, and noted that the return should have been automatic. But since it wasn't twice, it was obviously not something they were going to fix. Realizing that this is not really relevant to the product itself, i did not figure in this factor when giving the four star rating. Nonetheless, you should know it for your own decision.Overall, very pleased with the purchase. Good, sturdy pants with nice features at a competitive price. They aren't Carhartts, but I didn't really want Carhartts or to pay Crahartt prices . I wish I had waited and bought it locally for the reduced price, but at the time this was as good a deal as I could find.

When I wear these pants all the females wanna have sex with me.

I like the Wrangler's Riggs jeans and I tried their line of cargo pants. I found them to be a good fit and great for office/work attire. Would like to see more colors, than just the 5 provided, but that's my personal preference.

These are great work pants. I ordered some car hearts and they ran small and so I decided to try to wrangler ones and these are super nice looking. I love the leather wrangler emblem. They also have a wonderful pockets they’re super comfortable in their true to size.

Comfortable, rugged pants with deep front pockets. Side pockets used for carrying reading glasses and driving glasses.

Very comfortable and nice for work. Runs a little large but it’s honestly convenient for work because it allows more room for movement. I currently work in crawl spaces regularly and these are the most comfortable work pants I own for moving through tight spaces with tools

Buscaba pantalon gruesocon rodillas algo reforzadas y bolsillo lateral para monedero. Para ir en scooter. Pues genial. Ademas talla perfecta igual a los vaqueros pero mas resistente. Muy comodo. Todo un acierto. Por cierto la funcion ayuda talla adecuada de Amazon es una chorrada. Da 161cm por un pantalon L36. Todo el mundo sabe que L36 es de pierna muy larga y no tiene nada que ver con los 161 que me daba Amazon. O sea Escoger talla vaquero talla americana. L36 es Length o sea pierna muy larga y el W es Waist ambos in inches. W34 son 90cm tailla mas o menos. En Europa seria una 102 de hombres. Alto y razonablemente delgado.

I wouldn’t normally spend over £40 on a pair of trousers, but I’ve been starting to find holes in my existing clothes recently, and I wanted something with a bit of quality. These caught my eye as 100% cotton, and from a good brand, so I thought they’d be worth a punt. Typically, 36” waist is a comfortable fit for me, requiring a belt to secure, and my day to day jeans are all 36”. Sadly, my better 34” days are behind me now, because various health and injury issues have stunted my penchant for running.Anyway, the Wrangler Riggs were delivered promptly, and first impressions were very good. They seem heavy, and well constructed. I’d bought from Amazon themselves, to avoid any ambiguity over third-party authenticity. Unfortunately, upon trying the trousers on, I found that the waist size was very unforgiving. I could just button them up, but no belt would be needed, and I wouldn’t want to risk eating a large meal.Aside from the waistline issue, I really liked the way they fit, and the 32” leg was perfect.Four stars, as I would have been very happy, had the trousers just not been so judgemental of my circumference.So, return process started, and I’ll probably revisit my hunt for quality trousers on another day.

Great trousers definitely would have been five star rating but you can't put knee pads in even though one review said you could. There's a small opening at the bottom of the knee but it's about an inch wide. Not a chance of fitting pads in.

The fabric, design and stitching was beautiful however the width of thighs of the pants was too large to wear. Waist was correct but the overall width of the pants proportion with the waist was impractical in my opinion. I had to return it regretfully.

Largo perfecto para el propósito del pantalón, armado robusto, no se le han colgado herramientas o dado uso rudo pero aguantará sin problema.Sólo la cintura y la ingle están un poco reducidas, como señalan algunos comentarios por lo que subimos una talla, aún así es incómodo para tareas de desempeño. Son gruesos, por lo que no se recomienda para trabajar bajo el sol durante jornadas largas.1.72 m y 70 Kg de peso, tallas compradas 31x30, Sugeriría subir a 32 o 33 de cintura.