4x32 Acog Scope Prism Scope Red Fiber Optic Chevron Rifle Scope Black

incredibly surprised, i watched a bunch of videos on these to see how they actually hold on a real rifle. a true acog was out of the budget so i gave this a shot, initially for a 22 but tried it on a 556 and believe it or not, its stayed true without any issues or adjustments. the fiber picks up light very well even when totally shaded the chevron is clearly visible. the glass is very clear as well. im beyond happy with this purchase, didnt think it have a chance but i might actually order more.

Much better than I expected, a really good bargain prism optic. No regrets!

This is a clone of the TA31. Illumination is excellent. First ambient illuminating reticle for me. I direct sunlight it's not too bright. Turrets are point of impact meaning from your point of view you are making the bullet go up for up and right for right. The range I took it to uses yards to set up steel, not meters. The TA31 reticle is in terms of meters. Successful hits at 12 inch steel at 500 yards, 400, and multiple hit confirmations at 8 inch steel at 150 (137 meters) yards (successful hits at 5 or more in a row). There's about a 10% difference between yards and meters. It matters, but in this case it worked out. I didn't think id get this to zero. Does not come with instructions. Close to TA31s half moa per click or near. I decided to try for the last time by holding chevron tip on bullseye and trying to get groups at 5 moa low at 10 meters on paper (Google ai said this would reflect an approximate 100 yard zero). After that I basically zeroed by placing the 400 meter etching on a 400 yard target (it takes too long to walk that far, they already had steel set up there, and paper target berms are not set up for meters when using their target stands). Made a 5 moa up vertical adjustment based off visual impact inspection at a 400 yard steel round and then brought it back down 3 moa (or whatever i did). After that i was able to hit 400 yard steel with the 400 mark on the reticle and then 500 kentuckying for wind (55 grain). Being able to hit those at that distance isn't an accident, even hitting them just twice, and it wasn't in a row like at 150 but it was more than once. According to the TA31 instructions, which this is a clone of, you zero at 100 meters by placing the tip of the chevron in the bullseye. At 150 yards I'm hitting steel, easily at least, by placing the legs of the chevron in the center of an 8 inch round. I would zero this on paper at 100 using the legs of the chevron as the impact point if you don't have steel to shoot at. I would confirm zero if you can with a range's steel set out at 400 and make some minor adjustments to try to get impact at that distance. If you can hit at that distance it's not an accident. All things considered this is excellent for 60 dollars. If the company would just do a little bit of quality control this is a famously good acog clone. Edit: (Regarding the following, it's actually just an illusion of the illumination smear at the very top of the ranging reticle) The centerline was off by about a tenth of a millimeter with the center of the chevron. I didnt notice until after a satisfying zero. Edit: It's not off.

It’s pretty good it’s weird but one time when I shot with my Nerf gun with this, it went straight at the center I also didn’t know that my Nerf gun would be that strong

I'm going to keep this short and sweet. Mounted mine to a 300 Blk AAC AR with quality muzzle break that significantly reduces recoil. The quality is questionable. Not a fan of the thumb screw mounting method. Red dot held center for one, maybe one and a half range sessions. Then completely lost center and landed high right regardless of readjustment. I question if I received a sub-quality on-off with defect considering the numerous reviewers praising it's functionality during high caliber usage, but it didn't hold up for me. Giving it a solid three stars because during initial testing this scope was quick and easy to site, hit with precision repeatedly, and had significant range potential. The value for money is there if you're into airsoft. Couldn't recommend for anybody who's actually using this for practical range shooting. By it your own risk.